Jump to content

Online (Zoom)

Aalborg University Business School

PhD defence by Claus Højmark Jensen

Aalborg University Business School (AAUBS) is proud to invite anyone interested to this PhD defence. Title of the lecture: Capital Budgeting and Strategic Investments: A Control Perspective. The thesis will be defended digitally via Zoom.

Online (Zoom)

30.03.2022 13:00 - 16:00

  • English

  • Online

Online (Zoom)

30.03.2022 13:00 - 16:00

English

Online

Aalborg University Business School

PhD defence by Claus Højmark Jensen

Aalborg University Business School (AAUBS) is proud to invite anyone interested to this PhD defence. Title of the lecture: Capital Budgeting and Strategic Investments: A Control Perspective. The thesis will be defended digitally via Zoom.

Online (Zoom)

30.03.2022 13:00 - 16:00

  • English

  • Online

Online (Zoom)

30.03.2022 13:00 - 16:00

English

Online

Title of the thesis: Capital Budgeting and Strategic Investments: A Control Perspective. 

PROGRAM

12:40: Pre-meeting, assessment committee, moderator

13:00: Welcome by Moderator

13:05: PhD presentation (40 min)

13:45: Break

14:00: Opponents examination

15:30: Questions from the audience

16:00: End of defence

MEMBERS OF THE ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE

  • Professor Per Nikolaj Bukh, Aalborg University Business School, DK (chair)
  • Professor, Joan Ballantine, Ulster University, UK
  • Associate Professor, Ivar Friis, Copenhagen Business School, DK

PRINCIPAL SUPERVISOR

Associate Professor Niels Sandalgaard, Aalborg University Business School, DK

SECONDARY SUPERVISOR

Professor Thomas Borup Kristensen, Aalborg University Business School, DK

MODERATOR

Professor, Jacob Brix, Aalborg Business School, DK

HOW TO PARTICIPATE

The thesis will be defended digitally via Zoom. Please click here to participate.

Meeting ID: 617 1060 2945
Passcode: 699164

Participants will during the first break email their questions to Jacob Brix: jbri@business.aau.dk

If there are no questions, the assessment committee joins in another ”meeting” and evaluates. Participants stay in the “Defence meeting” and wait for the assessment committee to join the “defence-meeting” again.